Home » GEO Consultant

Generative Engine Optimization AI Overview Optimization AI Citation Strategy

📅 August 2026  ·  👤 Ottmar J.G. Francisca  ·  ⏱ 9 min read  ·  Amsterdam, NL

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) consultant — I’m Ottmar J.G. Francisca, an independent consultant in Amsterdam. I get your brand cited inside Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, ChatGPT and Copilot — not just ranked — using the GRAAF Framework, a 100-point method built from 200+ traffic recovery cases. What sets this work apart: a named methodology, a free AI Citations Tracker you can verify yourself, and direct access to me — no account managers, no junior staff.

Note on “GEO”: On this page, GEO means Generative Engine Optimization — the practice of earning citations inside AI-generated answers. It’s unrelated to geotechnical engineering or geospatial consulting.

• Citations beat clicks: With ~68% of U.S. Google searches now ending without a click, being named in an AI answer is the new first-touch. (SparkToro / Bain, 2026)
• GEO is different from SEO: AI systems evaluate entity clarity, source authority and factual density — not keyword density or backlink counts. (Princeton GEO Study, 2023)
• Most “GEO experts” are rebadged: In 2026, most agencies updated their SEO copy and called it GEO. Proof is a named method, live citation tracking and before/after data — not marketing claims.
• The GRAAF Framework is verifiable: A 100-point per-page standard I created and publish openly — you can check every scored page at app.contentscale.site.
• You can start free: Check your current citation status across AI platforms now with the free AI Citations Tracker before spending anything.

📑 On This Page

1. Why Search Changed — and What Replaced the Click
2. GEO vs. SEO vs. AEO — What’s Actually Different
3. How AI Systems Decide Who to Cite
4. The GRAAF Framework — How I Score Pages
5. Existing Content vs. New Content — What I Do Differently
6. Who I Work With
7. What a 90-Day Engagement Delivers
8. GEO Statistics 2025–2026
9. FAQ — 8 Questions People Ask

Sources: SparkToro / Bain, 2026 · Gartner, 2025 · Princeton GEO Paper, 2023

Why Search Changed — and What Replaced the Click

The discovery process your buyers use has structurally changed in the last 24 months. Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Copilot now answer a significant share of commercial queries directly — synthesizing multiple sources into one response, naming 3–7 trusted citations, and rarely sending the user to a results page at all. Gartner (2025) projects traditional search engine volume will drop 25% by 2026 as AI tools absorb that traffic.

For businesses, this creates a new hierarchy: rank in Google blue links and get cited in the AI answer above them — or cede the first impression entirely to whoever does. According to 6sense’s 2025 Buyer Experience Report, 94% of B2B buyers now use generative AI tools during their purchase process, making AI search a critical channel for reaching prospects while they’re actively evaluating options.

“GEO is the practice of optimizing content to be cited and surfaced inside generative engines. Techniques such as citing sources, including statistics, promoting semantic clarity and quoting experts are extensions of existing SEO practices — but they must be done with AI retrieval behavior in mind.”

— Progress Sitefinity, SEO and GEO: A Practical Guide for 2026

The practical consequence: pages that used to earn impressions and clicks from organic rankings now need to satisfy two additional audiences — the AI crawlers that index them for retrieval, and the language models that synthesize them into answers. Ignoring either audience means being ranked but not cited — which is increasingly the same as being invisible.

Key Point: A brand that earns 10,000 impressions but zero AI citations has a GEO gap, not an SEO gap. Fixing that gap is different from fixing a ranking — it requires a different diagnosis and different changes.

GEO vs. SEO vs. AEO — What’s Actually Different

These three terms get conflated constantly in 2026, often by agencies using all three interchangeably. They’re related, but they optimize for different outcomes and require different techniques:

Factor	SEO	AEO	GEO
Target	Google blue-link rankings	Featured snippets, PAA boxes	AI-synthesized citations (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews)
Success metric	Ranking position, clicks	Snippet ownership, PAA frequency	Citation frequency + sentiment across AI platforms
Key signals	Backlinks, keywords, Core Web Vitals	Concise answers, schema markup	Entity clarity, factual density, source authority, structured data
Tracking tool	Google Search Console, Ahrefs	SERP feature tracking tools	AI Citations Tracker, Profound, Evertune

Real GSC data — ContentScale.site CTR improvement tracked over 90 days as pages moved up in rankings and began appearing in AI Overviews. This is my own site, not a client.

Key Point: You don’t have to choose between SEO and GEO — the best approach optimizes for both simultaneously. A page that earns a Google ranking AND gets cited in the AI Overview for the same query earns more total visibility than either alone.

How AI Systems Decide Who to Cite

Large language models and retrieval-augmented systems don’t rank pages the way Google does. They evaluate potential source content on a different set of signals before deciding what to quote, paraphrase or name in a response. Understanding this is the foundation of any GEO strategy that actually works.

The Princeton GEO paper (Aggarwal et al., 2023) — the study that coined the term — tested nine optimization techniques and measured which produced the highest citation lift. The top four: citing authoritative sources (+40% visibility improvement), adding verifiable statistics, including fluent expert quotations, and improving content clarity. Keyword stuffing and backlink-style signals produced no measurable improvement in AI citation rates.

These signals align directly with what Google’s Quality Rater Guidelines call E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). The overlap isn’t accidental — both Google AI Overviews and independent AI systems like ChatGPT and Perplexity were trained on corpora where high-E-E-A-T content dominated the signals for trustworthy answers. Improving one improves the other.

Key Point: AI systems don’t “choose” sources at random. They apply a consistent preference for entity-clear, source-attributed, factually dense content. That preference is diagnosable and fixable — and that’s exactly what GEO consulting addresses.

The GRAAF Framework — How I Score Pages Before Optimizing

I created the GRAAF Framework after analysing 200+ traffic recovery cases. It scores every page on 100 points across five quality signals that both Google and large language models use to evaluate source trustworthiness. Nothing is published without a GRAAF score — quality is measured, not assumed.

A GRAAF ContentScore of 65/100 is a problem — pages below 75 consistently fail to earn AI citations. The per-signal breakdown shows exactly which of the five signals is dragging the score and what to fix before publishing or rewriting.

The GRAAF ContentScore scanner is available free at app.contentscale.site. Paste any URL and get a per-signal breakdown with specific fix recommendations. I use the same tool at the start of every engagement to establish a baseline — so you know exactly what’s being fixed and why.

You can read the full methodology at contentscale.site/graaf-framework/. Every signal is documented, every score is explained. That transparency is intentional — the framework has to be reproducible to be useful.

Existing Content vs. New Content — Two Different Workflows

GEO work splits into two distinct tracks — and the tools, trackers and brief types are different for each. Getting this diagnosis right first determines where the fastest citation gains are and what the engagement actually involves.

Most engagements start with existing content — the trackers identify which published pages are already close to citation-ready and need the smallest intervention for the fastest result. New-content briefs then fill the topic gaps that no existing page covers. Both use the same underlying GRAAF methodology; the difference is whether the score measures a live page or sets a target for a page not yet written.

“Treating GEO as a one-time content tweak is the biggest mistake you can make. GEO demands the same ongoing discipline as SEO — AI engines weigh recency when selecting sources, and a guide published in 2024 with no updates loses ground to a 2026 article on the same topic.”

— Search Engine Land, Mastering GEO in 2026

Key point: You can verify both tracks yourself before committing to an engagement. Run any existing URL through the free AI Citations Tracker to see citation status and the first fix recommendations. For new content, the GRAAF ContentScore scanner shows what a finished page must score before publishing — no black box, no guesswork.

Check Your Current Citation Status — Free

Before any engagement, I recommend checking where your brand actually stands across AI platforms. The tracker takes 60 seconds and shows YES/NO citation status for Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot.

→ Run the Free Citation Check

Or talk to me directly: WhatsApp +31 6 2807 3996 · Amsterdam, NL

Who I Work With

I work one-on-one with decision-makers who have a measurable visibility problem and want to understand exactly what’s being done to fix it — not a black-box retainer. These situations fit best:

What a 90-Day Generative Engine Optimization Engagement Delivers

A GEO engagement is a systematic citation loop: measure the gap, diagnose why competitors get cited instead, ship the changes, and verify the result. Here’s exactly what that includes:

GEO & AI Search Statistics — 2025–2026

~68% of U.S. Google searches end without a click — AI answer boxes, ChatGPT and Perplexity intercept queries before users reach organic results. (SparkToro / Bain, 2026)

25% projected drop in traditional search volume by 2026 — Gartner attributes this shift to AI chatbots and virtual agents absorbing commercial queries. (Gartner, 2025)

Up to 40% citation-lift with targeted GEO optimization — The Princeton study demonstrated that citing sources, adding statistics and quoting experts produced the highest measurable improvement in AI-generated source citation. (Aggarwal et al., Princeton / Georgia Tech / IIT Delhi, 2023)

94% of B2B buyers use generative AI during purchase research — AI search is no longer a consumer novelty; it’s the dominant discovery channel for B2B commercial intent. (6sense Buyer Experience Report, 2025)

AI search queries average 23 words vs. 4 words for traditional Google — longer, conversational queries mean AI systems need deeper topical coverage from cited sources, not short keyword-matched pages. (Andreessen Horowitz, via Geoptie, 2026)

Google AI Overviews appear in 15–60% of searches — coverage varies by query type and region, but for commercial and informational queries — the exact queries your buyers use — AI Overview presence is now the norm, not the exception. (Semrush, 2026)

What the Research Says

“GEO strategies focus on expanding a brand’s semantic footprint, improving fact-density, and enhancing structured data signals so that AI systems can retrieve and cite that content with confidence.”

— Go Fish Digital, Generative Engine Optimization Strategies, 2026

“AI engines strongly favor earned media — authoritative third-party sources — over brand-owned content. Understanding this dynamic isn’t optional. It’s the foundation of any effective GEO strategy.”

— Search Engine Land, Mastering GEO in 2026

“Being cited is not the same as being chosen — that distinction is essential to credible GEO measurement. Citation frequency tells you how often you appear; citation sentiment tells you whether it’s helping or hurting.”

— Profound / Lily Ray, Top GEO Experts, 2026

The 48-Hour Plan to Get Cited by AI

I’ve published a step-by-step plan that walks through every phase: AI citation audit → entity fix → GRAAF scoring → citation tracking loop. It uses the free tracker and scanner at every step.

→ Open the Free 48-Hour Plan

Generative Engine Optimization Consultant — 8 Questions People Ask

Ready to get cited by AI?

Start with a free citation check — or message me to discuss your brand’s AI visibility gap and what it would take to close it.

💬 WhatsApp Ottmar → Free citation check

Or email info@contentscale.site  ·  Services & enquiry page

📚 Related

• The GRAAF Framework — the full 100-point methodology behind every GEO engagement.
• Free AI Citations Tracker — check your page’s citation status across AI platforms, free, in 60 seconds.
• What is an AI Overview? — how Google selects and cites sources in AI-generated answers.
• Case Study: CTR Recovery — documented Google Search Console data showing ranking and CTR improvement over 90 days.
• 48-Hour Plan to Get Cited by AI — step-by-step: audit, entity fix, GRAAF score, citation tracking loop.