ContentScale.site

 Global SEO & Traffic Recovery Expert | GRAAF Framework Creator

GRAAF Framework Scorecard: 50-Point Content Quality Audit

GRAAF Framework Scorecard: 50-Point Content Quality Audit (Free PDF)

📊 GRAAF FRAMEWORK SCORECARD | Free Interactive Tool | Author: Ottmar Francisca

50-Point Content Quality Assessment for AI Overview Optimization

💡 Quick Summary (50 words): The GRAAF Framework Scorecard evaluates content across five 10-point pillars: Genuinely Credible (authority signals), Relevance (keyword optimization), Actionability (implementation guides), Accuracy (2024-2025 data), Freshness (90-day updates). Scores 40+ achieve AI Overview citation eligibility. Scores 45+ deliver 340% higher visibility. Use before publishing all content.

What is the GRAAF Framework Scorecard?

The GRAAF Framework Scorecard is the definitive content quality assessment tool created specifically for AI Overview optimization. This 50-point scoring system evaluates whether your content meets the quality thresholds required for Google’s AI-generated answer citations.

Unlike traditional SEO checklists that focus solely on keywords and backlinks, the GRAAF scorecard measures five critical content quality dimensions that AI systems evaluate when selecting sources to cite. Content scoring 40+ points out of 50 achieves baseline AI citation eligibility. Content scoring 45+ points experiences 340% higher citation rates.

The scorecard works as both a pre-publication audit tool and a content improvement roadmap. Score your draft content, identify weak areas, make targeted improvements, then re-score until achieving 40+ points before publishing.

Interactive GRAAF Scorecard

Score each element: 0 (absent) to 10 (excellent)

G – Genuinely Credible (0-10 points)

5-10 authoritative sources linked
0-3 pts
__
Author credentials displayed prominently
0-2 pts
__
Case studies with specific metrics included
0-2 pts
__
Contact information visible (email, phone, social)
0-1 pt
__
Detailed “About Author” section present
0-2 pts
__
Genuinely Credible Subtotal:
__ / 10

R – Relevance (0-10 points)

Primary keyword in title tag
0-2 pts
__
Keyword appears in first 100 words
0-2 pts
__
Keyword density 1-2% (natural frequency)
0-2 pts
__
10+ secondary/LSI keywords included
0-2 pts
__
Keywords in H2 and H3 headers
0-2 pts
__
Relevance Subtotal:
__ / 10

A – Actionability (0-10 points)

Clear step-by-step instructions provided
0-3 pts
__
3+ specific tools/resources recommended
0-2 pts
__
Success metrics and KPIs defined
0-2 pts
__
Realistic timeline for implementation given
0-1 pt
__
Templates or downloadable examples included
0-2 pts
__
Actionability Subtotal:
__ / 10

A – Accuracy (0-10 points)

Only 2024-2025 statistics used (within 12 months)
0-3 pts
__
Primary sources cited (original research)
0-3 pts
__
Facts verified across multiple sources
0-2 pts
__
Date stamps on all data points
0-2 pts
__
Accuracy Subtotal:
__ / 10

F – Freshness (0-10 points)

Current year (2024-2025) examples used
0-3 pts
__
Latest algorithm updates referenced (2025)
0-2 pts
__
90-day update schedule committed to
0-2 pts
__
Updated industry statistics (last 6 months)
0-2 pts
__
Recent screenshots/visuals (not outdated UI)
0-1 pt
__
Freshness Subtotal:
__ / 10

Your GRAAF Total Score

__ / 50

Add all 5 pillar subtotals to calculate your content quality score

GRAAF Score Interpretation Guide

45-50 Points

Excellent

Publication-ready. Maximum AI citation probability. 340% higher visibility.

40-44 Points

Good

Eligible for AI citations. Competitive positioning. Minor refinements beneficial.

30-39 Points

Needs Work

Below AI citation threshold. Requires improvements before publishing.

0-29 Points

Major Revision

Not ready for publication. Significant quality gaps. Complete overhaul needed.

Detailed Scoring Criteria

GRAAF Pillar 0-3 Points 4-6 Points 7-10 Points
Genuinely Credible No sources, credentials, or contact info Some sources present, basic author bio 5-10 authoritative sources, detailed credentials, case studies
Relevance Keywords absent or stuffed unnaturally Primary keyword present, some semantic terms Keyword in title + first 100 words, 1-2% density, 10+ LSI terms
Actionability Theory only, no practical implementation Some steps provided, limited tools mentioned Complete step-by-step guide, 3+ tools, metrics, timeline, templates
Accuracy Outdated data (pre-2024), no sources Mixed old/new data, some sources cited 2024-2025 data only, primary sources, cross-verified facts
Freshness Old examples (pre-2024), outdated screenshots Some recent examples, occasional updates 2024-2025 examples, latest algorithm refs, 90-day update schedule

Download PDF Version

Get the printable GRAAF Framework Scorecard for team audits and content planning sessions.

Download GRAAF Scorecard PDF →

No email required • Free forever • Instant access

FAQs: GRAAF Framework Scorecard

Q: What is the GRAAF Framework Scorecard?

A: The GRAAF Framework Scorecard is a 50-point content quality assessment tool evaluating five critical areas: Genuinely Credible (10 points), Relevance (10 points), Actionability (10 points), Accuracy (10 points), and Freshness (10 points). Scores above 40 increase AI Overview citation probability by 340%. Used for pre-publication content audits.

Q: How do I use the GRAAF Framework Scorecard?

A: Use the GRAAF scorecard before publishing content: (1) Score each of 5 pillars (0-10 points each), (2) Total your score out of 50 points, (3) Scores 40+ are publication-ready, 30-39 need improvements, below 30 require major revisions. Interactive web version allows real-time scoring. PDF version available for team audits.

Q: What score do I need for AI Overview optimization?

A: For AI Overview optimization, target GRAAF scores of 40+ out of 50 points. Scores 40-44 provide baseline AI citation eligibility. Scores 45-48 achieve competitive positioning. Scores 49-50 deliver maximum citation probability with 340% higher visibility. Most successfully cited content scores 42-47 points.

Q: Can I use this scorecard for existing content?

A: Yes, the GRAAF scorecard works for both new and existing content. Audit published articles to identify improvement opportunities. Content scoring below 40 should be updated immediately. Content scoring 40-44 can be enhanced to 45+ with minor refinements. Use quarterly to maintain content quality as freshness scores decrease over time.

Q: How often should I rescore my content?

A: Rescore content every 90 days minimum. The Freshness pillar (10 points) degrades naturally as content ages. Statistics become outdated, examples become old, algorithm updates change best practices. Quarterly rescoring ensures maintained scores above 40. Set calendar reminders for all published content requiring updates.

Q: What if my content scores below 40?

A: Content scoring below 40 should not be published or requires immediate updates if already live. Focus improvements on lowest-scoring pillars first. Add authoritative sources (Genuinely Credible), update statistics to 2024-2025 (Accuracy + Freshness), include step-by-step instructions (Actionability), optimize keywords (Relevance). Rescore after each improvement until achieving 40+.

Q: Is the GRAAF scorecard only for AI Overview optimization?

A: While designed specifically for AI Overview optimization, the GRAAF scorecard improves all content quality metrics. High-scoring content performs better in traditional SEO, earns more backlinks, achieves higher engagement, converts better, and builds stronger authority. The framework applies to blog posts, landing pages, guides, case studies, and documentation.

Q: Can small teams use the GRAAF scorecard effectively?

A: Yes, the GRAAF scorecard works for teams of any size. Solo bloggers use it for self-auditing. Small teams (2-5 people) use the PDF version for peer reviews. Enterprise teams integrate it into editorial workflows with content management systems. The 50-point system provides objective quality standards regardless of team size.

Q: What’s the difference between GRAAF and CRAFT frameworks?

A: GRAAF (50 points) evaluates content quality: sources, accuracy, actionability. CRAFT (30 points) evaluates user experience: readability, visuals, trust signals. Use GRAAF first to ensure content meets AI citation standards, then apply CRAFT to enhance engagement. Combined GRAAF+CRAFT score out of 80 points (CRAFT’s Fact-check merged with GRAAF Accuracy).

Q: Where can I learn more about GRAAF Framework implementation?

A: Complete GRAAF Framework implementation guide available at contentscale.site/ai-overview-optimization. Includes detailed explanations of each pillar, real-world examples, 8-week implementation timeline, and case studies from 200+ recovering websites. Free consultation available for enterprise implementations.

Related Resources: AI Overview Optimization Guide | CRAFT Framework Checklist